Family Court Office

  • Trustfeed ratings Icon
  • Trustfeed ratings Icon
  • Trustfeed ratings Icon
  • Trustfeed ratings Icon
  • Trustfeed ratings Icon

Charlotte, United States

nccourts.org
County court· Government office· Courthouse

Family Court Office Reviews | Rating 1.3 out of 5 stars (5 reviews)

Family Court Office is located in Charlotte, United States on 832 E 4th St. Family Court Office is rated 1.3 out of 5 in the category county court in United States.

Address

832 E 4th St

Phone

+1 7046860201

Accessibility

Wheelchair-accessible entrance

Open hours

...
Write review Claim Profile

B

Beatriz Velasco

Who ever answers the phone needs to be put in training on how to treat people. I'm calling as a concerned mothers for my child's well being and she could not care less. Please do something about her asap.

J

Jeremiah McPherson

They dont pick up at all!! How do these people still have jobs!! Please get people who will pick up and take people cases seriously

B

Brittany Miller

I call everyday and leave messages and no has EVER called me back. I was in labor with my baby in the hospital during my mediation orientation and I tried telling them this repeatedly, but I just look like a no call no show because no one will return my calls or pick up the phone!!

B

Bre M

Who let “judge” Johnston become a judge? What a joke! I came with someone who was getting their case handled by her along with watching others before them... she looks hard evidence in the face and ignores it. She’s should’ve just been a lawyer for common liars.

L

Lee Cramer

Our 9-year-old grandchild lived with his grandmother since he was about 8 months old, and his grandmother has had custody since December 2011. In September 2016 there was a custody hearing in which the court ordered shared custody, with a review in December. The child was supposedly represented by the Council for Childrens Rights (CFCR). Item 7 of the September court order reads: \Defendant shall ensure that the child attends any and all extracurricular activities as scheduled and on time.\ At the time the child was enrolled in i9 flag football. The mother never got the child to his game on time and was absent for 53% of the child's playing time. The court was also concerned with the child's school tardiness when in his mother's care. CFCR misrepresented the number of tardies while in the mother's care during the 3-months between hearings. Prior to the September hearing, when CFCR asked the child where he preferred to live, he told them he wanted to stay with his grandmother. CFCR recommended permanent custody to the mother. And prior to the review hearing CFCR again asked the child where he preferred to live. Having been ignored by CFCR previously, this time he told them he wanted to go back and forth. CFCR and the blew all this off and the court rubber-stamped CFCR's recommendation to give the mother full permanent custody. I wonder what impression it has made on the child now that CFCR failed him twice and the court failed him twice. For more details see my review of CFCR.